Exploring the Versatility of Bacillus spp. Secondary Metabolites: its mode of action and application in various field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/aabr.2024.2.2Keywords:
Biocontrol, Bacillus, Secondary Metabolites, SustainabilityAbstract
Bacillus spp. is a rich source of various Secondary Metabolites (SMs) that are used for diverse purposes. These include lipopeptides, non-ribosomal peptides, polyketides and many more which possess strong antimicrobial, antifungal and insecticidal properties thereby making them useful ingredients for biotechnology, agriculture, cosmetics, healthcare and food preservation. This review provides an overview on the current understanding of Bacillus SM’s diversity that has been overlooked to some extent as well as their mode-of-action and application prospects. Recent technological advancements—such as metagenomics, synthetic biology, CRISPR-Cas9, machine learning, microfluidics, and high-throughput screening—have accelerated discoveries and optimized SM production. The use of SMs as plant growth promoting compound in agriculture controlling pathogens while may also have pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmetic applications. Furthermore, they possess a broad range of industrial applications, including use in detergents and food preservatives, offering more versatility and environmental friendliness compared to chemical alternatives. Though there has been significant progress there still exist major knowledge gaps in regulation and ecological roles played by SMs that need to be addressed through research. As we uncover the secrets behind the production and various application of SMs, microorganisms can become effective allies in addressing global challenges for a healthier, more sustainable planet.
References
Horneck, G. (1993). Responses of Bacillus subtilis spores to space environment: Results from experiments in space. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 23(1), 37-52.
Drejer, E. B., et al. (2018). Genetic tools and techniques for recombinant expression in thermophilic bacillaceae. Microorganisms, 6(2), 42.
Santoyo, G., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., & Govindappa, M. (2012). Mechanisms of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity in soil bacterial species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas: A review. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 22(8), 855-872.
Stein, T. (2005). Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: Structures, syntheses and specific functions. Molecular Microbiology, 56(4), 845-857. Kaspar, F., Neubauer, P., & Gimpel, M. (2019). Bioactive secondary metabolites from Bacillus subtilis: A comprehensive review. Journal of Natural Products, 82(7), 2038-2053.
Typas, A., et al. (2012). From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 10(2), 123-136.
Tran, C., et al. (2022). Antimicrobial Bacillus: Metabolites and their mode of action. Antibiotics, 11(1), 88.
Kenig, M., Vandamme, E., & Abraham, E. (1976). The mode of action of bacilysin and anticapsin and biochemical properties of bacilysin-resistant mutants. Microbiology, 94(1), 46-54.
Bouhss, A., et al. (2009). Specific interactions of clausin, a new lantibiotic, with lipid precursors of the bacterial cell wall. Biophysical Journal, 97(5), 1390-1397.
Arguelles Arias, A., et al. (2013). Characterization of amylolysin, a novel lantibiotic from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83037.
Huang, E., & Yousef, A. E. (2014). The lipopeptide antibiotic paenibacterin binds to the bacterial outer membrane and exerts bactericidal activity through cytoplasmic membrane damage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 80(9), 2700-2704.
Duraisamy, S., et al. (2020). Bacteriocin—a potential antimicrobial peptide towards disrupting and preventing biofilm formation in clinical and environmental locales. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 44922-44936.
Kiesewalter, H. T., et al. (2021). Genomic and chemical diversity of Bacillus subtilis secondary metabolites against plant pathogenic fungi. mSystems, 6(1), 10.1128/msystems.00770-20.
Swierstra, J., et al. (2016). Structure, toxicity, and antibiotic activity of gramicidin S and derivatives. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 35, 763-769.
Wu, C., et al. (2018). Investigations into the mechanism of action of sublancin. ACS Infectious Diseases, 5(3), 454-459.
Maksimova, E. M., et al. (2021). Multifaceted mechanism of amicoumacin A inhibition of bacterial translation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 618857.
Chung, L. K., & Raffatellu, M. (2019). Probiotic fengycins dis (Agr) ee with Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Cell Research, 29(2), 93-94.
Mogi, T., & Kita, K. (2009). Gramicidin S and polymyxins: The revival of cationic cyclic peptide antibiotics. Cellular Molecular Life Sciences, 66, 3821-3826.
Paiva, P. M., et al. (2010). Antimicrobial activity of secondary metabolites and lectins from plants. Current Research, Technology Education Topics in Applied Microbiology Microbial Biotechnology, 1(2), 396-406.
Qi, G., et al. (2010). Lipopeptide induces apoptosis in fungal cells by a mitochondria-dependent pathway. Peptides, 31(11), 1978- 1986.
Leclère, V., et al. (2005). Mycosubtilin overproduction by Bacillus subtilis BBG100 enhances the organism’s antagonistic and biocontrol activities. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 71(8), 4577-4584.
Qiao, J., et al. (2024). Research advances in the identification of regulatory mechanisms of surfactin production by Bacillus: A review. Microbial Cell Factories, 23(1), 100.
Zhou, L., et al. (2020). Regulatory mechanisms and promising applications of quorum sensing-inhibiting agents in control of bacterial biofilm formation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article 589640.
Chaabouni, I., Guesmi, A., & Cherif, A. (2012). Secondary metabolites of Bacillus: Potentials in biotechnology. In Bacillus thuringiensis biotechnology (pp. 347-366).
Rivardo, F., et al. (2009). Anti-adhesion activity of two biosurfactants produced by Bacillus spp. prevents biofilm formation of human bacterial pathogens. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 83, 541-553.
Englerová, K., et al. (2021). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens–derived lipopeptide biosurfactants inhibit biofilm formation and expression of biofilm-related genes of Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics, 10(10), 1252.
Ferreira, W. T., et al. (2021). Micellar antibiotics of Bacillus. Pharmaceutics, 13(8), 1296.
Hubbard, J., Harman, G., & Hadar, Y. (1983). Effect of soilborne Pseudomonas spp. on the biological control agent Trichoderma Hamatum, 655-659.
Lyng, M., et al. (2024). Competition for iron shapes metabolic antagonism between Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas marginalis. The ISME Journal, 18(1), Article wrad001.
Knerr, P. J., & Van Der Donk, W. A. J. (2012). Discovery, biosynthesis, and engineering of lantipeptides. Annual Review of Microbiology, 66, 479-505.
Sachla, A. J., Alfonso, A. J., & Helmann, J. D. (2021). A simplified method for CRISPR-Cas9 engineering of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology Spectrum, 9(2), Article e00754-21.
Dholiya et al Exploring the Versatility of Bacillus spp. Secondary Metabolites
Song, C. W., Rathnasingh, C., & Song, H. (2021). CRISPR Cas9 mediated metabolic engineering of a mucoid Bacillus licheniformis isolate for mass production of 2,3-butanediol. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 175, Article 108141.
Jiang, C., et al. (2024). Enhancement of green production of heme by deleting odor-related genes from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens based on CRISPR/Cas9n. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72(29), 16412-16422.
Rychel, K., Sastry, A. V., & Palsson, B. O. (2020). Machine learning uncovers independently regulated modules in the Bacillus subtilis transcriptome. Nature Communications, 11(1), 6338.
Albornoz, R. V., Oyarzún, D., & Burgess, K. (2024). Optimisation of surfactin yield in Bacillus using data-efficient active learning and high-throughput mass spectrometry. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 23, 1226-1233.
Dunlap, C., & Bowman, M. (2014). The use of genomics and chemistry to screen for secondary metabolites in Bacillus spp. biocontrol organisms. In Biopesticides: State of the Art and Future Opportunities (pp. 95-112). ACS Publications.
Kjeldgaard, B., et al. (2022). Quantitative high-throughput screening methods designed for identification of bacterial biocontrol strains with antifungal properties. Microbiology Spectrum, 10(2), e01433-21.
Mohamad, O. A., et al. (2018). Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of endophytic bacterial populations from Chinese traditional medicinal plant licorice and characterization of the bioactive secondary metabolites produced by Bacillus atrophaeus against Verticillium dahliae. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 924.
Albayrak, Ç. B. (2019). Bacillus species as biocontrol agents for fungal plant pathogens. In Bacilli Agrobiotechnology: Phytostimulation Biocontrol (pp. 239-265).
Brar, S. K., et al. (2007). Bacillus thuringiensis proteases: Production and role in growth, sporulation and synergism. Process Biochemistry, 42(5), 773-790.
Xia, M., et al. (2024). Bacillus subtilis YZ 1 surfactins are involved in effective toxicity against agricultural pests. Pest Management Science, 80(2), 333-340.
Saxena, A. K., et al. (2020). Bacillus species in soil as a natural resource for plant health and nutrition. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 128(6), 1583-1594.
Bacon, C. W., Palencia, E. R., & Hinton, D. M. (2014). Abiotic and biotic plant stress-tolerant and beneficial secondary metabolites produced by endophytic Bacillus species. In Plant Microbes Symbiosis: Applied Facets (pp. 163-177). Springer.
Joe, M. M., et al. (2012). Development of surfactin-based nanoemulsion formulation from selected cooking oils: Evaluation for antimicrobial activity against selected food associated microorganisms. 43(2), 172-180.
Etesami, H., Jeong, B. R., & Glick, B. R. (2023). Potential use of Bacillus spp. as an effective biostimulant against abiotic stresses in crops—A review. Current Research in Biotechnology, 100128.
Shao, J., et al. (2015). Contribution of indole-3-acetic acid in the plant growth promotion by the rhizospheric strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. 51, 321-330.
Bose, S., Kumar, P.S., & Rangasamy, G. (2023). Exploring the role of biosurfactants in the remediation of organic contaminants with a focus on the mechanism: A review. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 123585.
Bezza, F.A., & Chirwa, E.M.N. (2017). The role of lipopeptide biosurfactant on microbial remediation of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)-contaminated soil. Chemical Engineering Journal, 309, 563-576.
Ganesan, N.G., & Rangarajan, V. (2021). A kinetics study on surfactin production from Bacillus subtilis MTCC 2415 for application in green cosmetics. Biocatalysis Agricultural Biotechnology, 33, 102001.
Karnwal, A., et al. (2023). Microbial biosurfactant as an alternate to chemical surfactants for application in cosmetics industries in personal and skin care products: A critical review. BioMed Research International, 2023(1).
Majeed, M., et al. (2023). A randomized double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the anti-skin-aging effect of LactoSporin–the extracellular metabolite from Bacillus coagulans (Weizmannia coagulans) MTCC 5856 in healthy female volunteers. Clinical, Cosmetic Investigational Dermatology, 769-782.
Duarte, M., et al. (2022). Current postbiotics in the cosmetic market—An update and development opportunities. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 106(18), 5879-5891.
Majeed, M., et al. (2020). Skin protective activity of LactoSporin— the extracellular metabolite from Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856. Cosmetics, 7(4), 76.
Peyrat, L.-A., et al. (2019). Terrestrial microorganisms: Cell factories of bioactive molecules with skin protecting applications. Molecules, 24(9), 1836.
Margret, A.A., et al. (2022). Subtilisin an eminent microbial product as a potential skin care regulator of melanogenesis: A paradigm synchronized with in vitro/in silico approach. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology Food Sciences, 12(1), e2847.
Singh, B.K. (2021). An overview of enzymes and their use in the detergent industry. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences Humanities, 11(12), 71-76.
Madhu, A., & Chakraborty, J.N. (2017). Developments in application of enzymes for textile processing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 114-133.
Choudhury, P., & Bhunia, B. (2015). Industrial application of lipase: A review. Biopharm Journal, 1(2), 41-47.
Mukherjee, A. (2007). Potential application of cyclic lipopeptide biosurfactants produced by Bacillus subtilis strains in laundry detergent formulations. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 45(3), 330-335.
Bouassida, M., et al. (2018). Potential application of Bacillus subtilis SPB1 biosurfactants in laundry detergent formulations: Compatibility study with detergent ingredients and washing performance. Engineering in Life Sciences, 18(1), 70-77.
Awais, M., et al. (2007). Isolation, identification and optimization of bacitracin produced by Bacillus sp. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(4), 1303.
Stansly, P., & Schlosser, M. (1947). Studies on polymyxin: Journal of (5), 549-556.
Shleeva, M. O., Kondratieva, D. A., & Kaprelyants, A. S. (2023). Bacillus licheniformis: Pharmaceutics, (7), 1893. Mascher, T., et al. (2003). Cell wall stress responses in Bacillus subtilis: Molecular (5), 1591-1604.
Chan, J. L., Diaconescu, A. C., & Horvath, K. A. (2017). Routine use of topical bacitracin to prevent sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, (5), 1496-1500.
Trimble, M. J., et al. (2016). Polymyxin: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, (10), a025288.
Mihai, M. M., et al. (2015). Microbial biofilms: Current (16), 1552- 1576.
Yan, L., et al. (2020). Novel biomedical functions of surfactin A from Bacillus subtilis in wound healing promotion and scar inhibition. Journal of (26), 6987-6997.
Alara, J. A., & Alara, O. R. (2024). Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm potentials of biosurfactants. In Industrial Applications of Biosurfactants and Microorganisms (pp. 307-339). Elsevier.
Jain, M., et al. (2023). Probiotics and their bioproducts: Microorganisms, (10), 2393.
Harwood, C. R., et al. (2018). Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, (6), 721-738.
Tran, T. D., et al. (2020). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ALB65 inhibits the growth of Listeria monocytogenes on cantaloupe melons. Applied Environmental Microbiology, (1), e01926-20.
Ávila, M., et al. (2014). Inhibitory activity of reuterin, nisin, lysozyme and nitrite against vegetative cells and spores of dairy related Clostridium species. International Journal of Food Microbiology, , 70-75.
Bouassida, M., et al. (2018). Potential application of Bacillus subtilis SPB1 biosurfactants in laundry detergent formulations: Compatibility study with detergent ingredients and washing performance. Engineering in Life Sciences, 18(1), 70-77.
Awais, M., et al. (2007). Isolation, identification and optimization of bacitracin produced by Bacillus sp. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(4), 1303.
Stansly, P., & Schlosser, M. (1947). Studies on polymyxin: Journal of (5), 549-556.
Shleeva, M. O., Kondratieva, D. A., & Kaprelyants, A. S. (2023). Bacillus licheniformis: Pharmaceutics, (7), 1893. Mascher, T., et al. (2003). Cell wall stress responses in Bacillus subtilis: Molecular (5), 1591-1604.
Chan, J. L., Diaconescu, A. C., & Horvath, K. A. (2017). Routine use of topical bacitracin to prevent sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, (5), 1496-1500.
Trimble, M. J., et al. (2016). Polymyxin: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, (10), a025288.
Mihai, M. M., et al. (2015). Microbial biofilms: Current (16), 1552- 1576.
Yan, L., et al. (2020). Novel biomedical functions of surfactin A from Bacillus subtilis in wound healing promotion and scar inhibition. Journal of (26), 6987-6997.
Alara, J. A., & Alara, O. R. (2024). Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm potentials of biosurfactants. In Industrial Applications of Biosurfactants and Microorganisms (pp. 307-339). Elsevier.
Jain, M., et al. (2023). Probiotics and their bioproducts: Microorganisms, (10), 2393.
Harwood, C. R., et al. (2018). Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, (6), 721-738.
Tran, T. D., et al. (2020). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ALB65 inhibits the growth of Listeria monocytogenes on cantaloupe melons. Applied Environmental Microbiology, (1), e01926-20.
Ávila, M., et al. (2014). Inhibitory activity of reuterin, nisin, lysozyme and nitrite against vegetative cells and spores of dairy related Clostridium species. International Journal of Food Microbiology, , 70-75.
