Indian Journal of Extension Education
Year: 2021 (Jul-sep), Volume: (57), Issue. (3)
First page: (24) Last page: (27)
Online ISSN: 2454-552X
Print ISSN: 0537- 1996
doi:10.48165/IJEE.2021.57306

Adoption Status of Crop Production Practices in Direct Seeded Rice: A Case Study of Kapurthala District of Punjab (India)
Rajan Bhatt*and Pritpal Singh2

1Senior Soil Scientist, Regional Research Station, Kapurthala, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab
2Senior Extension Scientist (Soil Science), FASC, Bathinda, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab
*Corresponding author email id: rajansoils@pau.edu

Received:
21 April 2021

Accepted:
8 June 2021

Online Published:
28 June 2021

How to cite the Article

Bhatt, R., & Singh, P. (2021). Adoption Status of Crop Production Practices in Direct Seeded Rice: A Case Study of Kapurthala District of Punjab (India). Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(03), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2021.57306 Cite
Bhatt, Rajan, and Pritpal Singh. “Adoption Status of Crop Production Practices in Direct Seeded Rice: A Case Study of Kapurthala District of Punjab (India).” Indian Journal of Extension Education, vol. 57, no. 03, 2021, pp. 24–27, http://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2021.57306. Cite
1.
Bhatt R, Singh P. Adoption Status of Crop Production Practices in Direct Seeded Rice: A Case Study of Kapurthala District of Punjab (India). IJEE. 2021;57(03):24‑7. DOI: 10.48165/IJEE.2021.57306 Cite
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is images.png
View on Google Scholar

ABSTRACT

The labor scarcity amid lockdown due to COVID-19 and reduced labor migration from other states made timely rice establishments a big challenge for the farmers in Punjab. The direct seeded rice (DSR) emerged as economically viable option for timely rice establishment, but several farmers faced difficulties in DSR during kharif­-2020 and therefore, adopted diverse crop production and management practices. A detailed survey was conducted in different blocks of Kapurthala district (Punjab) and data were collected from randomly selected 106 farmers. The results showed that 13.2% of total farmers completely failed in DSR. There was large variation in different crop production and management practices followed by the farmers. Seed rate varied between 19.9 and 22.2 kg ha-1 and was significantly higher in Kapurthala, while lowest in Dhilwan block. Nitrogenous fertilizer application was higher by 13.0 and 5.7% in Sultanpur Lodhi and Nadala blocks than the district average of 167.9 kg N ha-1. Phosphoric and potash fertilizer application rates varied between 6.7 and 12.1 kg P ha-1 and 3.3 and 9.7 kg K ha-1, respectively. Rice grain yield varied between 64.3 and 70.2 q ha-1 under DSR, as compared with 71.3 and 76.3 q ha-1 under puddled transplanted rice (PTR). The irrigation water productivity varied between 3.6 and 4.4 kg ha-1 mm-1 in DSR, compared with 3.3 and 3.6 kg ha-1 mm-1 under PTR. The results highlight the lack of proper knowledge and adoption of recommended practices for DSR technology among farmers, which require further intensive extension efforts for creating awareness in between them.

Keywords

Direct seeded rice, Labor availability, Crop management, Fertilizer usages